Cases 91 - 100 of 166
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00645
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Deerspace LLC v. Plastics Recycling Technology
as 1:2015cv00073
Plaintiff:
Deerspace LLC
Defendant:
Plastics Recycling Technology Inc and Miller Waste Mills Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOZIER v. LOOP
as 4:2015cv00032
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY JAIL, FRANK LOOP and DARRYL MILLS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CODY LOZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STAUP v. AZTECA MILLING, L.P.
as 3:2015cv00027
Defendant:
AZTECA MILLING, LP
Plaintiff:
TRISHA STAUP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
TURNER v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2015cv00108
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, BRUCE LEMMON, MILLS and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN S. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOX v. ADM MILLING COMPANY
as 1:2014cv02100
Defendant:
ADM MILLING COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
GENTRY et al v. FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 4:2014cv00054
Defendant:
OFFICER ATHERTON, JOHN/JANE DOE, FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA and others
Plaintiff:
TABITHA GENTRY, MICHAEL HERRON, VINCENT MINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing Inc et al
as 3:2014mc00012
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission, Illinois State of and North Carolina State of
Defendant:
Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing Inc, FHTM Inc, Alan Clark Holdings LLC and others
Receiver:
Robb Evans
Mills v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00434
Plaintiff:
Ron V Mills
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
