Cases 91 - 100 of 144
Christensen v. Wiseman et al
as 1:2011cv01837
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Christensen
Defendant:
Russell B. Wiseman, Steven Eckstein, Shane M. Leuthold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
In re: Discipline of Joseph E. Hudak
as 11-3011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
In re: JOSEPH E. HUDAK, Esq., Attorney PA I.D.45882 A Member of the Bar of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL and PENNSYLVANIA LAWYERS' FUND FOR CLIENT SECURITY
IN RE Office of Disciplinary Counsel
as 2:2011mc00058
Respondent:
Geoffrey I. Ekenasi
Petitioner:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
IN RE Office of Disciplinary Counsel
as 2:2011mc00059
Respondent:
B. Michael Smith
Petitioner:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
IN RE Office of Disciplinary Counsel
as 2:2011mc00060
Respondent:
John A. Grafton
Petitioner:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
In Re Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Albright
as 2:2011mc00030
Petitioner:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Respondent:
Joseph P. Albright, Jr.
In Re: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Justice
as 2:2011mc00027
Petitioner:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Respondent:
Rodney S. Justice
Cause Of Action: Disbarment Proceedings
Allen Feingold v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, et al
as 11-1459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN L. FEINGOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, ANTHONY SEDROSKI and others
In Re: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bloom
as 2:2011mc00015
Petitioner:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Respondent:
Arthur Louis Bloom
Cause Of Action: Disbarment Proceedings
Ronald Glick v. Dave Edwards, et al
as 11-35035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD D. GLICK
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVE EDWARDS and DOES, 1-20
Defendant:
ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PEG ALLISON, STUART STADLER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
