Cases 91 - 100 of 892
Coln v. Penske Truck Leasing Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01129
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Coln
Defendant:
Penske Truck Leasing Corporation, Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. doing business as Fedex Ground, Parker Tractor & Implement Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Lambert v. Parker et al
as 1:2021cv00053
Plaintiff:
James Lambert
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Dr. Elaina Rodela, CoreCivic/South Central Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2021cv00698
Plaintiff:
Harold Wayne Nichols and Jonathan Stephenson
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Jane or John Doe, Tony Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porterfield v. Shelby County Crim. Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02528
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Crim. Justice Center, Floyd Bonner, Jr., Mr. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. Parker
as 3:2021cv00606
Plaintiff:
Jack Burke
Defendant:
Tony Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Rausch et al
as 3:2021cv00592
Plaintiff:
Barry L. Clark
Defendant:
David B. Rauch, Tony C. Parker and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porterfield v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02503
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Dr. O. Webb, Dr. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradfield v. Parker
as 2:2021cv02500
Petitioner:
Ronnie Bradfield
Respondent:
Tony Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rucker v. Purviance et al
as 3:2021cv00555
Plaintiff:
Morris Rucker
Defendant:
Jim Purviance, Richard Montgomery, Zane Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
