Cases 91 - 100 of 123
Rhonda Taylor v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-51010
Petitioner - Appellant:
RHONDA TAYLOR, as Next Friend of a Mentally Incompetent Person, Kevin R. Gordon, II
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-20636
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jessica R. Gordon v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv06758
Defendant:
Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Alcon Research, Ltd. and DOES
Plaintiff:
Jessica R. Gordon
GORDON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70651
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN R. GORDON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GORDON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv03039
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR R. GORDON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GORDON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv38932
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN R. GORDON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
GORDON v. GIANT EAGLE, INC.
as 2:2010cv00540
Plaintiff:
MARK R. GORDON
Defendant:
GIANT EAGLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GORDON v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
as 2:2010cv01682
Petitioner:
STEVEN R. GORDON
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gordon et al v. City of Oakland et al
as 3:2009cv05794
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Gordon and Gareth R. Gordon
Defendant:
City of Oakland, John A. Russo, Robert Bernal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gordon et al v. City of Oakland et al
as 3:2009cv05794
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Gordon and Gareth R. Gordon
Defendant:
City of Oakland, John A. Russo, Robert Bernal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
