Cases 91 - 100 of 145
Rodriguez v. Ongay
as 1:2013cv03265
Plaintiff:
Raul Rodriguez
Defendant:
Jose Luis Ongay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Rodriguez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv00741
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Raul Rodriguez
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Simple Factory et al
as 3:2013cv01056
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garcia
Defendant:
Simple Factory , Jorge E. Rodriguez, Margarita Hopgood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Home Orthopedics Corp. v. Rodriguez, et al
as 12-2387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOME ORTHOPEDICS CORP.
Defendant - Appellee:
RAUL RODRIGUEZ, JOSE A. LINARES, JULIO F. JULIA and others
Raul Rodriguez-Lopez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-73250
Petitioner:
RAUL RODRIGUEZ-LOPEZ, AKA Jose Anduaga
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Taylor D v. Court of Corrections-Part F et al
as 1:2012cv05503
Plaintiff:
Eric Taylor D
Defendant:
Court of Corrections-Part F, John O'Conner, NYC Correction Bureau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raul Rodriguez-Quezada v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-71793
Petitioner:
RAUL RODRIGUEZ-QUEZADA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Ponce v. United States of America et al
as 4:2012cv00025
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, GEO Group, US Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
Raul Rodriguez Ponce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Raul Rodriguez v. Timothy Busby
as 2:2011cv09821
Respondent:
Timothy Busby
Petitioner:
Raul Rodriguez
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated v. Rodriguez et al
as 4:2011cv00729
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated
Defendant:
Raul Rodriguez and Al J's Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
