Cases 91 - 100 of 431
Greene v. Robinson et al
as 3:2020cv00305
Plaintiff:
Corey Greene
Defendant:
Allegra Montgomery Walker and Gail B. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Utz v. Crotts et al
as 1:2020cv01063
Defendant:
FNU Scott, Latasha Beard, FNU Woods and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Utz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. J & J Custom Builders, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00175
Plaintiff:
Antwan Robinson
Defendant:
J & J Custom Builders, LLC and Jeremy James
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
C&W LLP et al v. Burgerim Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00085
Plaintiff:
Wendy W Rose, Cheryl Robinson, C&W LLP and others
Defendant:
Michael Bohbut, Burgerim Group, Inc., John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Payne v. Harris et al
as 1:2020cv01042
Defendant:
C/O D. Jones, D. K. Jones, S. Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clearview Residences, LLC et al v. Memphis and Shelby County Board of Adjustment
as 2:2020cv02117
Plaintiff:
Charles Richardson, Jr., Clearview Residences, LLC, Peggy Robinson and others
Defendant:
Memphis and Shelby County Board of Adjustment
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robinson v. F.H. Cann & Associates, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00110
Defendant:
F.H. Cann & Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary J. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wagoner v. Krogers et al
as 2:2020cv02054
Defendant:
Parkwest Hospital, Food-City-Corporation & Pharmacy Dept., Krogers and others
Plaintiff:
Ron P. Wagoner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Shelby County Sherrifs Dep et al
as 2:2020cv02036
Defendant:
Shelby County Sherrifs Dep, Officer Ewing, Sherrif Bonner and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Laverne Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
