Cases 91 - 100 of 490
Brooks v. RCF 2 Acquisition Trust et al
as 4:2022cv01112
Plaintiff:
Tonna Brooks
Defendant:
RCF 2 Acquisition Trust and Selene Finance LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SELENE FINANCE LP v. ROSE
as 1:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
SELENE FINANCE LP
Defendant:
MICHELLE M ROSE
Interested Party:
SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT and SEBASTICOOK VALLEY HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
DiPrete v. Selene Finance, LP et al
as 1:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
R. Francis DiPrete
Defendant:
Selene Finance, LP and Bendett & McHugh, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SELENE FINANCE LP v. M&M Mortgage Services, Inc.
as 4:2022cv03781
Plaintiff:
SELENE FINANCE LP
Defendant:
M&M Mortgage Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2022cv03777
Plaintiff:
SELENE FINANCE LP and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
M&M Mortgage Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2022cv03778
Defendant:
SELENE FINANCE LP, M&M Mortgage Services Inc and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rodriguez v. McDonald et al
as 4:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
Samuel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Leonard J McDonald, Unknown McDonald, Tiffany & Bosco PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
