Cases 91 - 100 of 1,478
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04299
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03608
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Derrick Allen, Sr. v. SunTrust Bank
as 20-1921
Defendant / Appellee:
SUNTRUST BANK, TRUIST BANK, BETH BARHAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK MICHAEL ALLEN, SR.
Rentas v. SunTrust Bank et al
as 3:2020cv00733
Defendant:
Luke Norris and SunTrust Bank
Plaintiff:
Phillip Rentas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steel v. Suntrust Banks, Inc.
as 5:2020cv00392
Plaintiff:
Patricia A Steel
Defendant:
Suntrust Banks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Robin Gustin v. SunTrust Bank, et al
as 20-12844
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., BANK OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBIN GUSTIN, an individual
Novak & Gouveia LTDA. v. Bank of America National Association et al
as 6:2020cv01317
Plaintiff:
Novak & Gouveia LTDA.
Defendant:
Bank of America, Suntrust Bank, Bank of America National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emmanuel Edokobi v. SunTrust Bank
as 20-1796
Defendant / Appellee:
SUNTRUST BANK, TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION, DONNA WILSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL EDOKOBI
Sherman v. Sherrod
as 2:2020cv11922
Defendant:
M.D. Shirley T. Sherrod and Shirley T. Sherrod, M.D., P.C., a Michigan professional corporation
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Sherman, D.O., P.C., d/b/a Physician Eye Care Associates of Garden City and D.O. Michael S Sherman
Intervenor:
SunTrust Investment Services, Inc. and SunTrust Bank n/k/a Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Edwards v. Suntrust Banks Inc. Employee Benefit Plan
as 3:2020cv00533
Plaintiff:
sharon Edwards
Defendant:
Suntrust Banks INC. Employee Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
