Cases 91 - 100 of 751
AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. DOROTHY TINSLEY BRITTON et al
as 1:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
DOROTHY TINSLEY BRITTON and LULA TUDOR BRITTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Tinsley v. State of Texas
as 4:2022cv00405
Petitioner:
Michael Shane Tinsley
Respondent:
State of Texas and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tinsley v. American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Laurel Tinsley
Defendant:
American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jimmy Tinsley v. Harold Clarke
as 22-6470
Petitioner / Appellant:
JIMMY EDWARD TINSLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Department of Corrections
United States v. Tinsley
as 22-5030
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BYRON THOMAS TINSLEY, JR.
USA v. Ivoree Tinsley
as 22-3319
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
IVOREE TINSLEY
Tinsley et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq00581
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Robert Tinsley and Kimberly Tinsley
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Chevron USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Engwall et al v. Tinsley et al
as 8:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Dean Trew, Neal Engwall, Christie Sikora and others
Defendant:
Bobby Tinsley, Brian Quimby, Skuxchange, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mills v. Tinsley et al
as 5:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Chris Ryan Mills
Defendant:
Josh Tinsley, Oklahoma Department of Public Safety, Oklahoma Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Gary Tinsley
as 22-1417
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GARY TINSLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
