Cases 91 - 100 of 329
Seaborn v. Va. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 7:2019cv00639
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, H. Scott Richeson, A. David Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Jesovha Octavius Seaborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allah v. Kiser et al
as 7:2019cv00633
Plaintiff:
Asiatic Royalprince Allah and Vernon Lee Brooks
Defendant:
James D. Lambert, Walter G. Swiney, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juul Labs, Inc. v. The Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A
as 1:2019cv01126
Defendant:
The Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A, Abdulrasool Ghulamhussain, Mohammed Jaber and others
Plaintiff:
Juul Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Meyers v. Manis et al
as 7:2019cv00558
Defendant:
AW Anderson, Prison Guard Cox, AW Combs and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dolin v. Kindred et al
as 3:2019cv00537
Defendant:
Walter Minton, Lieutenant Jones, Sergent Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00502
Defendant:
Denise Malone, Henry Ponton, Earl Barksdale and others
Plaintiff:
Tyquine R. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry-Bey et al v. Esper et al
as 2:2019cv00344
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harold, Roy L. Perry-Bey, Clarence Lawson and others
Defendant:
Mark T. Esper, Richard V. Spencer, Robert Wilkie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Caldwell et al
as 7:2019cv00465
Defendant:
Douglas Hubert and Donald Caldwell
Plaintiff:
Walter L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McCullum v. Kappelmann et al
as 1:2019cv00705
Defendant:
Dale Walters, Mark Kappelmann and John Redmond
Plaintiff:
Lemuel C McCullum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Meyers v. Manis et al
as 7:2019cv00406
Defendant:
Ulm Collins, Hawkins, Walter Swiney and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
