Cases 91 - 100 of 70,772
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lynn Detillion v. OH Dept of Rehabilitation and Corr, et al
as 24-3347
Plaintiff:
LYNN EVELYN DETILLION
Defendant:
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION and OHIO CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, AFSCME LOCAL 11, AFL-CIO
Tamica Branscumb v. Horizon Bancorp, Inc.
as 24-1357
Plaintiff:
TAMICA BRANSCUMB, an individual
Defendant:
HORIZON BANK, identified on initiating document as Horizon Bancorp, Inc.
C.S. v. Craig McCrumb, et al
as 24-1364
Plaintiff:
C.S., by her next friend, Adam Stroub
Defendant:
CRAIG MCCRUMB, AMY LEFFEL and MICHAEL PAPANEK
John Cook v. David Boss, et al
as 24-3350
Plaintiff:
JOHN COOK
Defendant:
DAVID BOSS, KELLY VASAS, JONATHON ROMANIN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Sheetz, Inc. et al v. City of Centerville, OH et al
as 3:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Sheetz, Inc., Morse Road Development LLC and Hemmert Far Hills Properties LLC
Defendant:
City of Centerville, OH, City Council of the City of Centerville, OH, Graceworks Lutheran Services d/b/a/ Bethany Lutheran Village and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00156
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ada Removal- Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
