General Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 101 - 110 of 66,629
Gibson v. Terry County Sheriff
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner: Charles Ray Gibson, Jr.
Respondent: Terry County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia-Romeo v. Colbert
as 3:2024cv00231
Plaintiff: Gonzalo Garcia-Romeo
Defendant: Warden D. Colbert
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00149
Petitioner: Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent: Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barraza v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00138
Petitioner: Alex Barraza
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McDonald v. Lumpkin
as 24-40269
Petitioner: Joseph Christopher McDonald
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 24-10362
Petitioner: Joseph Leonard Smith, Jr.
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Van Nortrick v. Hooper
as 24-30274
Petitioner: Roy Van Nortrick
Respondent: Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Rodriguez v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00535
Plaintiff: Abraham Salomon Rodriguez
Defendant: Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Beale v. Huffman
as 3:2024cv00109
Petitioner: Jerry Beale, Jr.
Respondent: Brand Huffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Hooper et al
as 2:2024cv01032
Plaintiff: Saul Johnson
Defendant: Timothy Hooper
Respondent: Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?