Cases 101 - 110 of 2,398
Howard v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01117
Plaintiff:
William Burn Howard
Defendant:
James Smith, Chad Marsh, Kevin Galebaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
as 3:2023cv01103
Plaintiff:
Levi Smith and Ashley Smith
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
SMITH v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
JAMIE K. SMITH
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Wilkins v. Redman et al
as 3:2023cv01114
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Wilkins and Daniel Ezra Wilkins
Defendant:
William Redman, Russell Olmstead, Kevin Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00580
Petitioner:
NICKOLAS SMITH
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
PENELTON v. MARION COUNTY JAIL "ADC" DR. et al
as 2:2023cv00574
Plaintiff:
KEVIN PENELTON
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY JAIL "ADC" DR., SMITH, PRIMARY HEALTHCARE PROVIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00568
Petitioner:
MARCUS SMITH
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Walmart Stores East, LP
as 3:2023cv01061
Plaintiff:
Robbyn Smith
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East, LP
Not Classified By Court:
Mark Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Sherman v. Merrillville The Town of et al
as 2:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Chanel Sherman
Defendant:
Merrillville The Town of, Jesus Solis, R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
