Cases 101 - 110 of 150
HARPER v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv21735
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10 and AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv21159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VASILE et al v. AMAZON.COM, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv20477
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., CORELLE BRANDS, L.L.C., INSTANT BRANDS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ERICA VASILE and TIMOTHY VASILE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv19985
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
WEINTRAUB v. DAUHATSU INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO DE MOVEIS E APARELHOS ELECTRICOS LTDA et al
as 2:2019cv19953
Defendant:
NEW CONCEPTION IMPORT & EXPORT CORPORATION, ABC CORP 1-20(fictitious), DAUHATSU INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO DE MOVEIS E APARELHOS ELECTRICOS LTDA, DBA TAIFF and others
Plaintiff:
WENDY WEINTRAUB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUGAR v. AMAZON.COM.DEDC, LLC
as 1:2019cv16531
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC. and AMAZON.COM.DEDC, LLC
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SUGAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LIONEL v. AMAZON.COM, INC.
as 1:2019cv13525
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC.
Plaintiff:
MISSOURI J. LIONEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DRAKE v. TELEKY et al
as 2:2019cv13049
Defendant:
BRUCE TELEKY, POSTERAZZI CORP., WALMART INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KENT L DRAKE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv12318
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
SQUAREWELL v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 3:2019cv12196
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, HERMAN BARON, ABC CORPORATION(S) 1-10 (FICTITIOUS DEFENDANTS) and others
Plaintiff:
RUFUS SQUAREWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
