Cases 101 - 110 of 921
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Yohn v. Amazon.com Service, LLC
as 1:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Yohn
Defendant:
Amazon.com Service, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Williams v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 3:2024cv00340
Respondent:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Petitioner:
Tammy J Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Holguin v. Kakai et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Holguin
Defendant:
Asif Kakai, MIL Carriers, Inc., Amazon.Com Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Werner v. Horton et al
as 3:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Gary M. Werner and Greg M. Werner
Defendant:
Jacob J. Horton, Principle Merchants Leasing LTD, Amazon Logistics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Buentello v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 5:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Buentello
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
