Cases 101 - 110 of 6,865
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv15613
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BUNDY v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2018cv02520
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Bundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00218
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Undetermined:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06084
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02516
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
STATEWIDE BONDING, INC et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2018cv02519
Plaintiff:
BIG MARCO INSURANCE AND BONDING SERVICES, LLC, MIKE DONOVAN, STATEWIDE BONDING, INC and others
Defendant:
JODY M. PRESCOTT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10026
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Cortes Almazo v. Decker et al
as 1:2018cv09941
Respondent:
Attorney General Jefferson B. Sessions, Director Thomas R. Decker, Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen and others
Petitioner:
Jorge Cortes and Jorge Cortes Almazo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv09948
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
