Cases 101 - 110 of 857
Harper v. Rudek, et al
as 15-6033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE E. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES RUDEK, Warden, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, CARL BEAR, Warden's Assistant and others
Briggs v. Jones et al
as 6:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
David Derrill Briggs
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Bruce Howard, Paula Inge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pemberton v. Patton et al
as 6:2014cv00511
Plaintiff:
Paul Pemberton
Defendant:
Robert Patton, Justin Jones, Debbie L. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Jones, et al
as 14-6214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRED SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, BRIAN WIDEMAN, REBECCA ADAMS and others
Briggs v. Jones et al
as 5:2014cv01183
Plaintiff:
David Derrill Briggs
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Bruce Howard, Paula Inge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali v. Jones et al
as 5:2014cv01174
Plaintiff:
Murtaza Ali
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Ed Evans, Robert Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waters v. Coleman, et al
as 14-1431
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GAIL WATERS, as personal representative of the Estate of Alonzo Ashley
Defendant - Appellant:
PHILLIP COLEMAN, a Denver Police Department Officer, in his official and individual capacity, PETE CONNER, in his official and individual capacity, JOE GASCA, in his official and individual capacity and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER
Rackley v. Blevins, et al
as 14-6203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD RACKLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNNY BLEVINS, DOC Internal Affairs, JUSTIN JONES, DOC Director, TIM WILKINSON, Warden (DFC) and others
Cleveland v. Harvanek, et al
as 14-7089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CLEVELAND
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMERON HARVANEK, Warden, DOUG BYRD, Warden, SUSAN WELCHER, Mailroom and others
Colburn v. Jone
as 14-7087
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAY D. COLBURN
Respondent - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrctions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
