Cases 101 - 110 of 144
Berry et al v. Third Circuit Court et al
as 2:2017cv12738
Petitioner:
Duane Letroy Berry
Respondent:
Michigan, State of, Third Circuit Court, Midland County Jail and others
Ranson v. Midland County
as 7:2017cv00157
Defendant:
Midland County
Plaintiff:
Sherman V. Ranson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Rod Riordan, Inc. et al
as 7:2017cv00071
Defendant:
Midland County Tax Assessor-Collector, R. O. Pomroy Equipment Rental, Inc., Kali Riordan and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Berry v. Midland County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv11154
Plaintiff:
Duane Berry
Defendant:
Midland County Jail, Scott Stephenson and Jane Doe
Hennessey Hunt v. Midland County
as 17-50125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENNESSEY HUNT
Defendant - Appellee:
MIDLAND COUNTY
Lilly #730472 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2016cv01446
Plaintiff:
Eugene Ray Lilly #730472
Defendant:
Michigan, State of and Midland, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Young et al
as 2:2016cv00255
Plaintiff:
George Hall, Jr
Defendant:
Jimmie Young, City of Midland, Texas, County of Midland County, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Midland County, Texas v. Archonix Systems, L.L.C.
as 7:2016cv00290
Defendant:
Archonix Systems, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Midland County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1441 (a) Breach of Contract
Infante v. Unnamed Policeman et al
as 7:2016cv00125
Plaintiff:
Saints D. Infante
Defendant:
Midland County Detention Center and Unnamed Policeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fortenberry v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 7:2016cv00040
Plaintiff:
Elmo Fortenberry
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Midland County Court, Midland County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
