Cases 101 - 110 of 727
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cottell v. Reardon
as 7:2022cv01178
Petitioner:
Adam Cottell
Respondent:
Patrick Reardon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
New Yorkers For Religious Liberty, Inc. et al v. The City Of New York et al
as 1:2022cv00752
Plaintiff:
New Yorkers For Religious Liberty, Inc., Gennaro Agovino, Curtis Cutler and others
Defendant:
The City of New York, Eric Adams, Dave Chokshi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Hunnicutt v. Reardon
as 1:2022cv00325
Petitioner:
Jerald B. Hunnicutt, Jr.
Respondent:
Reardon and Philip J. Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kelly et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00688
Plaintiff:
Aaronn Kelly, Abel R. Navarrette, Adam E. Altman and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cottell v. Reardon
as 9:2022cv00075
Petitioner:
Adam Cottell
Respondent:
Patrick Reardon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Balentine v. Annucci et al
as 9:2021cv01383
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson Balentine
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Patrick Reardon, Glenn McGuire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Hawkins v. Benjamin Wagner, et al
as 21-17099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN T. HAWKINS, AKA Ket T. Hawkins
Defendant / Appellee:
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, US Attorney, SCOTT W. MCGREGOR, US Attorney, TODD A. PICKLES, Assistant US Attorney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
