Cases 101 - 110 of 3,690
USA v. Jamond Rush
as 23-3256
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMOND M. RUSH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rush v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv01894
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kevin Rush
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrera v. Seaton et al
as 1:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Armando Barrera, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge R Shane Seaton, Stan Parker, Hardy L Wilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rushing v. Cape Girardeau County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Shaun Rushing
Defendant:
Cape Girardeau County Sheriff's Department and City of Cape Girardeau Officers Involved
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Collier et al
as 7:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cobb
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Warden J Smith, Sr and Sgt. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC et al
as 1:2023cv15469
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, House of Cheatham, Inc, Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sarah Rush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cobb v. Collier et al;
as 2:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cobb
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ Bryan Collier, Warden J Smith, Sr and Sgt. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
