Cases 101 - 110 of 290
Kiir v. Young
as 4:2020cv04052
Petitioner:
Diw Bol Kiir
Respondent:
Darin Young and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bell v. Brown et al
as 3:2020cv03006
Petitioner:
Thomas Phillip Bell and John Doe
Respondent:
Judge John L. Brown, The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota and Hughes County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ross v. Young et al
as 4:2020cv04007
Respondent:
Warden Darren Young and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Petitioner:
Shawn Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crutcher v. Leahey et al
as 5:2019cv05077
Respondent:
Jennifer Leahey and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Petitioner:
Byron Elroy Crutcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Berry v. Fluke et al
as 4:2019cv04188
Petitioner:
Kevin Berry
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of South Dakota and Brent Fluke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Asmussen v. Young et al
as 1:2019cv01024
Petitioner:
David John Asmussen
Respondent:
Warden Darin Young and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Knode v. Erickson et al
as 4:2019cv04181
Defendant:
State of South Dakota, Officer Kyler Pekarek, Officer Joseph Erickson and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dwight Knode
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Creek v. (SDDOC) Mental Health Department et al
as 4:2019cv04174
Petitioner:
Clayton Sheldon Creek
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota and (SDDOC) Mental Health Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Golliher-Weyer v. Young et al
as 1:2019cv01020
Respondent:
Warden Darin Young and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Petitioner:
Joseph Allen Golliher-Weyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tripp v. Dooly et al
as 4:2019cv04162
Respondent:
Daren Young, Bob Dooly and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Petitioner:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
