Cases 101 - 110 of 2,180
Moses v. USA
as 3:2023cv01645
Petitioner:
Norman Terry Moses
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gross v. Cox et al
as 1:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Reginald L. Gross
Defendant:
Stephen J. Cox, Michelle S. Englade, Johnathan Clay Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Quiroz et al v. City of Dayton et al
as 1:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Madelyn Marina Quiroz and Marina Naomi Hernandez Quiroz
Defendant:
Eduardo Hernandez, City of Dayton, Theo Melancon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hair v. Bells et al
as 5:2023cv00144
Defendant:
Becky Bells, Becky Harper, Garza County and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Hair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Goodson v. Hudson et al
as 6:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
Jakwauiane Goodson and Jakwaviane Goodson
Defendant:
Terry Hudson, Jr, Kelly Ashton and Patrick Farris, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell, Jr. v. Big V Feeds, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Rickie Russell, Jr.
Defendant:
Big V Feeds, Inc. and Terry Delmer Prater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
