Cases 101 - 110 of 4,006
Sims v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv08025
Petitioner:
Dermetris Sims
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bolong v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Sissoho Bolong
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Echols v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv08027
Petitioner:
Dennis Lamar Echols
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kizziah v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv08032
Petitioner:
Carl Billy Wade Kizziah, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McGhee v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01253
Plaintiff:
Annie R McGhee
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Picardi v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01042
Petitioner:
Melissa Anne Picardi
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cargill v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv08022
Petitioner:
Quincetta Y Cargill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Raley v. United States of America et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
Johnnie L. Raley
Defendant:
United States of America and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
United States of America v. Neal et al
as 1:2023mc04008
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Roderick Dewayne Neal
Garnishee:
Commercial Jet Services, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
