Cases 101 - 110 of 216
State of California v. Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians of California
as 1:2014cv01593
Defendant:
Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians of California
Plaintiff:
State of California
Amicu:
UNITE HERE Local 19
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Unite Here Local 19 v. Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians et al
as 1:2014cv01136
Plaintiff:
Unite Here Local 19
Defendant:
Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians and Chukchansi Economic Development Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Fortuna Enterprises, LP v. NLRB
as 14-1099
Petitioner:
Fortuna Enterprises, LP
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Unite Here Local 11
UNITE HERE, LOCAL 57 v. PITTSBURGH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 2:2014cv00292
Plaintiff:
UNITE HERE, LOCAL 57
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Unite Here Local 217 et al v Gleeda Ri Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00765
Plaintiff:
Unite Here Local 217, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
Gleeda RI, Inc. and Tanoor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Hirschhorn et al v. Unite Here Local 1 et al
as 1:2013cv08387
Plaintiff:
Heather Hirschhorn , Cyd Kirksey , Maya Raman and others
Defendant:
UNITE HERE Local 1 , DRTS Columbus Drive, LLC and Chicago Hotel Management Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
UNITE HERE Local 1 v. Mid City Plaza Hospitality, LLC
as 1:2013cv07801
Petitioner:
UNITE HERE Local 1
Respondent:
Mid City Plaza Hospitality, LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Unite Here Local 49 v. Khan
as 2:2013cv01985
Plaintiff:
Unite Here Local 49
Defendant:
Dam Khan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Unite Here Local 49 v. Khan
as 2:2013at01099
Plaintiff:
Unite Here Local 49
Defendant:
Dam Khan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
UNITE HERE LOCAL 54 v. BALLY'S PARK PLACE, INC.
as 1:2013cv04441
Plaintiff:
UNITE HERE LOCAL 54
Defendant:
BALLY'S PARK PLACE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
