Cases 101 - 110 of 215
Shinard v. Wexford Health Services Inc et al
as 8:2017cv03774
Plaintiff:
Alfred Shinard
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services Inc, Flurry, Colin Oltey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Scott, et al
as 3:2017cv01153
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Matthew Scott, Steven Strubberg, Shane Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Siddiqui et al
as 3:2017cv01127
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
Dr Siddiqui, Dr Ritz and Wexford Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stilwell v. Rubenstein et al
as 1:2017cv00164
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Stilwell
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, John Doe, Lance Yardley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv06825
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections, Wexford Health Services, Inc., John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatchett v. Wexford Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06060
Plaintiff:
Derrick Hatchett
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Inc., Obaisi, Don Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siever v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04223
Plaintiff:
Brad Siever
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANZA v. MOCLOCK et al
as 3:2017cv01318
Plaintiff:
ENRICO F. LANZA, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. MOCLOCK, KAREN (MERRITT) SCULLY, Wexford Health Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halbrook v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04197
Plaintiff:
Michael Halbrook
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANZA v. MOCLOCK et al
as 2:2017cv03256
Plaintiff:
ENRICO F. LANZA, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. MOCLOCK, KAREN (MERRITT) SCULLY, WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
