Cases 101 - 110 of 90,260
Huston v. Greyhound/Flixbus et al
as 2:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Michael Huston
Defendant:
Greyhound/Flixbus and Allied Universal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of Alabama et al v. Phelps (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Wilfred Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 2:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Otis Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State Of Alabama et al v. Casey
as 2:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Kiley Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Powell et al
as 7:2024cv00565
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Jordan Powell and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Cedric Orlando Young
Defendant:
Bonner, S Mitchell, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Su v. Mar-Jac Poultry of Alabama LLC
as 6:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Julie A Su
Defendant:
Mar-Jac Poultry of Alabama LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hancock Whitney Bank v. FLC Living, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Hancock Whitney Bank
Defendant:
FLC Living, LLC, Invinci Corporation, MJO Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Slade v. Love's Travel Stops and Country Stores Inc.
as 2:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Marshall Slade
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops and Country Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
