Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 234
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01580
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv02221
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03254
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sasser v. Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP et al
as 6:2015cv01423
Plaintiff: Gregory Sasser
Defendant: Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP , Frito-Lay Sales, Inc. , Frito-Lay, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01346
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05806
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Acosta et al v. Frito-Lay, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv02128
Defendant: Frito-Lay, Inc. , FL Transportation Inc. and PEPSICO, Inc.
Plaintiff: Daniel Acosta , Greg Frye , Jose Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01026
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv07339
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Arrowpac Incorporated et al v. Sea Star Line, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv01180
Plaintiff: Universal Container Line, Inc., Payless Shoesource, Inc., Kmart Corporation and others
Defendant: Leonard Shapiro, Saltchuk Resources, Inc., Sea Star Line, LLC and others
Intervenor: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0025

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?