Cases 111 - 120 of 201
HARRISON v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2016cv00356
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
TONY LA VELL HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ANKH EL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2015cv00391
Defendant:
ROBERT ALTICE, AMY BARBAR, SHEILA CARLISLE and others
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
AMUNDSEN et al v. ELI LILLY & COMPANY
as 1:2015cv01484
Plaintiff:
DAVID J. ADAMCHICK, JAMES HENERY AMUNDSEN, GOLDIE FAYE ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
ELI LILLY & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ANKH EL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2015cv00280
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH EL
Defendant:
SHEILA CARLISLE, TERRY CURRY, DANIEL HARRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00093
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
FRALEY v. KELLOGE et al
as 4:2015cv00089
Defendant:
CAPEHART, DOOLEY, JORDAN KELLOGE and others
Plaintiff:
HARRISON TEDDY FRALEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. HARRISON MANUFACTURING INC.
as 2:2015cv00130
Defendant:
HARRISON MANUFACTURING INC
Plaintiff:
SCOTT F. LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
STUDY v. MEYER et al
as 2:2015cv00101
Plaintiff:
JOHN STUDY
Defendant:
TODD J. MEYER, KEN CAMPBELL, MATTHEW C. KINCAID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00538
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARRISON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harrison v. Jaques et al
as 2:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Gary Joe Harrison
Defendant:
J Jaques , Captain Morris , Jeff Bang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
