Cases 111 - 120 of 455
United States of America v. Electronic information copied from the ASUS desktop computer, the IBM Server X3300, and the black desktop computer
as 3:2017mc00015
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Electronic information copied from the ASUS desktop computer, the IBM Server X3300, and the black desktop computer
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Keita v. IBM et al
as 1:2017cv01276
Defendant:
Apple, BMW Manhattan, CBS and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Keita
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Huang v. Construction Group et al
as 1:2017cv00882
Defendant:
1SP, CChinese Groups, Construction Group and others
Plaintiff:
Nanyan Huang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00789
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Tulk v. The Democratic National Party et al
as 2:2017cv00685
Plaintiff:
Sherry A. Tulk
Defendant:
Democratic National Party, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Donna Brazile and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00369
Defendant:
Apple Inc., CRM Search Inc., Corporate Con Edison and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bagby v. IBM Southeast Federal Credit Union
as 9:2017cv80055
Plaintiff:
Vincent A. Bagby
Defendant:
IBM Southeast Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Turret & Sunbelt Steel Company et al
as 1:2017cv00368
Defendant:
Apple Corp., Anthony Barna, CRM-INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
