Cases 111 - 120 of 181
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00487
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
James Blair v. Thomas Simpson
as 10-5122
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES BLAIR
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS L. SIMPSON
Richardson et al v. River Birch Homes, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv08138
Defendant:
River Birch Homes, Inc., River Birch Homes, L.L.C., Bechtel Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Tuntoa Denise Richardson, Tuntoa Denise Richardson, Tuntoa Denise Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cordrey v. Mathy et al
as 1:2009cv01382
Plaintiff:
Johnny R Cordrey
Defendant:
Joseph Mathy, Marcus Hardy, P Hastings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Linda L. Simpson v. A.c. And S., Inc. (armstrong Con, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-82489
Defendant:
A.c. And S., Inc. (armstrong Con
Plaintiff:
Linda L. Simpson
Simpson v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2009cv00372
Plaintiff:
Hollis L. Simpson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BALDWIN v. A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2009cv82489
Plaintiff:
LINDA L. SIMPSON
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Blair v. Simpson
as 5:2009cv00158
Petitioner:
James Blair
Respondent:
Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fuqua v. Simpson et al
as 5:2009cv00131
Plaintiff:
DeMarcus Fuqua
Defendant:
Thomas L. Simpson, Michael Ray and Bobby Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Jisis et al
as 5:2009cv00122
Petitioner:
Claude Cox
Respondent:
Byron Jisis and Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
