Cases 111 - 120 of 334
In Re: Wells Fargo ERISA 401(k) Litigation
as 0:2016cv03405
Plaintiff:
Francesca Allen , Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company , Wells Fargo Bank, NA , Wells Fargo Director of Human Resources and others
Movant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Elson v. Stumpf, et al.,
as 4:2016cv05817
Plaintiff:
Elson and Robert Elson
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO & COMPAY, Stumpf,, John G. Stumpf and others
Petitioner:
The City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Sherman v. Stumpf et al
as 4:2016cv05745
Plaintiff:
Alison Sherman
Defendant:
John G. Stumpf, Timothy J. Sloan, Carrie L. Tolstedt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook v. Loughlin et al
as 3:2016cv05592
Plaintiff:
Amy Cook
Defendant:
Michael J. Loughlin, Timothy J. Sloan, John G. Stumpf and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
The City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. Loughlin et al
as 4:2016cv05592
Plaintiff:
Cook, Police & Fire Retirement System City of Detroit, Public School Teachers' Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago and others
Defendant:
Loughlin, Suzanne M. Vautrinot, John R. Shrewsberry and others
Petitioner:
The City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Shaev v. Baker, II et al
as 3:2016cv05541
Plaintiff:
Victoria Shaev
Defendant:
John D. Baker, II, Elaine L. Chao, John S. Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
James v. Davis et al
as 4:2016cv02469
Plaintiff:
Trinity M James
Defendant:
Lorie Davis , Tony R O'Hare, Christopher S. Lacox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Jarrett Jame
as 16-3144
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JARRETT M. JAMES
Carlos James v. Comm of Social Security
as 16-6224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS M. JAMES
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
