Cases 111 - 120 of 503
Fant v. Equipment, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00046
Plaintiff:
Joe L. Fant
Defendant:
Unicarriers Americas Corporation , John Does 1-3 and Lionsquare Equipment, Inc.
Intervenor:
SuperValu, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yankee v. Kraft Heinz Foods Companyet al
as 1:2016cv02873
Plaintiff:
Ann Yankee
Defendant:
Kraft Heinz Foods Company , Target Corporation and Supervalu Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilkerson v. Supervalu, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
J.C. Wilkerson
Defendant:
Supervalu, Inc. and The Travelers Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ruffin v. Supervalu Inc.
as 8:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
Fatima Ruffin
Defendant:
Supervalu Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Close v. United Supermarkets, LLC et al
as 7:2015cv00232
Plaintiff:
James W. Close
Defendant:
Supervalu, Inc. and United Supermarkets, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jones v. Supervalu, Inc.
as 8:2015cv03775
Plaintiff:
Muriel H. Jones
Defendant:
Supervalu, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson v. Shoppers Food Warehouse Corporation et al
as 8:2015cv03529
Plaintiff:
Gloria Thompson
Defendant:
Shoppers Food Warehouse Corporation and Supervalu, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Close v. Susser Holdings Corporation et al
as 7:2015cv00165
Plaintiff:
James W. Close
Defendant:
Supervalu, Inc. and Susser Holdings Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
DISOMMA v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv07205
Plaintiff:
NOELLE DISOMMA
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. , SUPERVALU, INC. , SUPERVALU HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JFM Market, Inc., et al v. SuperValu, Inc.
as 15-3174
:
In re: Wholesale Grocery Products Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JFM Market, Inc. and MFJ Market, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
SuperValu, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
