Cases 111 - 120 of 827
Sizemore v. Phillips North America LLC et al
as 3:2021cv02301
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sizemore
Defendant:
Phillips North America LLC, Phillips RS North America LLC and Koninklijke Philips N.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00753
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Parks v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00322
Plaintiff:
Phillip E. Parks
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodrigues v. City of Campbell et al
as 4:2021cv02260
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rodrigues
Defendant:
City of Campbell, Nicholas Phillips, Pat Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. May et al
as 3:2021cv02228
Plaintiff:
John E. Phillips
Defendant:
Warden Harold May and Anitra Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Alfonso C. Askew v. Trumbull County et al
as 4:2021cv02133
Plaintiff:
Estate of Alfonso C. Askew
Defendant:
Trumbull County, Dr. Phillip Malvasi D.O. LLC, D.O. Phillip Malvasi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2021cv05071
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Phillips
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kay v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05028
Plaintiff:
Phillip Kay
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04967
Plaintiff:
Jay Phillips
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2021cv04635
Plaintiff:
Kevin Johnson
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, N Harris, Mr Chilcote and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
