Cases 111 - 120 of 130
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Howe, Kelley v. Middleton Village Nursing and Rehab Center et al
as 3:2011cv00247
Plaintiff:
Kelley Howe
Defendant:
Middleton Village Nursing and Rehab Center and William Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON et al v. HAVERFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2010cv06731
Plaintiff:
JANET WATSON and WILLIAM WATSON
Defendant:
HAVERFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE TOWNSHIP OF HAVERFORD, CARMEN D. PETTINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bynum v. Watson et al
as 2:2010cv00539
Plaintiff:
Katherine C. Bynum
Defendant:
William Watson , Portsmouth Sheriff's Department , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WATSON et al v. ICON INFORMATION CONSULTANTS LP et al
as 1:2010cv03380
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WATSON and ROBERT TOTH
Defendant:
ICON INFORMATION CONSULTANTS LP, PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS, AEROTEK ENERGY SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
E. Minns v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 10-1598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
E. GEORGE MINNS
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, BILL MIMS, in his official and individual capacities, WILLIAM WATSON, in his official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Wiand v. Watson
as 8:2010cv00189
Plaintiff:
Burton W. Wiand and Burton W. Wiand
Defendant:
William Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
