Cases 111 - 120 of 120,418
Ruben P. Arellano v. R. St. Andre
as 2:2024cv03560
Petitioner:
Ruben P. Arellano
Respondent:
R. St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Motion to Extend Time to File
Adam Michael Kendall v. Ongaro et al.
as 2:2024cv03591
Plaintiff:
Adam Michael Kendall
Defendant:
Ongaro, Markarde, Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Superior Court County of Lassen
as 2:2024cv01253
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Superior Court County of Lassen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Superior Court County of Trinity
as 2:2024cv01255
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Superior Court County of Trinity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Superior Court, County of Siskiyou
as 2:2024cv01257
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Superior Court, County of Siskiyou
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris
as 5:2024cv01293
Plaintiff:
Marvin Harris
Defendant:
John Doe, Acting Warden Bryan D. Phillips, Hollandberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Palma Roque v. Warden
as 2:2024cv03561
Petitioner:
Kevin Palma Roque
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Charles Wilson Jackson v. Patton State Hospital
as 5:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
Charles Wilson Jackson
Defendant:
Patton State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) DePonte v. Bowman, et al.
as 2:2024cv01262
Plaintiff:
David Arthur DePonte
Defendant:
Jessica Bowman and Daniel Queava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DePonte v. Stohl et al
as 3:2024cv01416
Plaintiff:
David Arthur DePonte
Defendant:
Stohl, Stern, J. Saucedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
