Cases 121 - 130 of 2,058
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Trevino v. Covello
as 1:2023cv00441
Petitioner:
Robert Trevino
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trevino v. Dotson et al
as 3:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
Robert Trevino
Defendant:
E. Dotson, T. Ross, S. Newcomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TREVINO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06297
Plaintiff:
AMY TREVINO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Welsh v. McLane, et al
as 5:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Respondent:
Marsha McLane, Chris Greenwalt, Michael Searchy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trevino-Alvarez v. Hawkins
as 4:2023cv00910
Petitioner:
Rosalinda Trevino-Alvarez
Respondent:
Warden T. Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Trevino v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00082
Petitioner:
Dean Trevino
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
In Re: Letter of Request from Mexico
as 1:2023mc00125
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Luis Fernando Lozano Villarreal and Sandra Alicia Trevino Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Smith v. Dooney & Bourke et al
as 1:2023cv01534
Plaintiff:
Maryssa Smith
Defendant:
Dooney & Bourke, Inc., Phil Kinsley, Peter Dooney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Trevino v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 7:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Sandra Isabel Trevino
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
