Cases 121 - 130 of 958
Ruble v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv00122
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ruble
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Clark v. Drug Enforcement Administration
as 4:2019cv02280
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Plaintiff:
James Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
Gibson v. Devos et al
as 6:2019cv03265
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Kevin Keleghan, Tony King and others
Plaintiff:
John Frederick Gibson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Steibel v. Saul
as 4:2019cv02111
Plaintiff:
Nanette Steibel
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Thompson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2019cv02115
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Kelvin C. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Thompson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2019cv02110
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Kelvin C. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Atchley v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv00114
Plaintiff:
Brantley Atchley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Nash v. Saul
as 4:2019cv02027
Plaintiff:
Lavella Nash
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
El Ahmad of the Family Bey v. Family Support Division et al
as 4:2019cv01935
Defendant:
Division 6 Judicial Administrator, Family Court Sommissioner Division 64, St. Louis County and others
Plaintiff:
El Ahmad of the Family Bey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Coin v. Saul
as 4:2019cv01932
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Coin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.