Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 157
Matthew Catanzaro v. Robert Carr, et al
as 12-1951
Plaintiff - Appellant: MATTHEW CATANZARO
Defendant - Appellee: ROBERT CARR, Psychologist, ANDREA TOBIAS, Psychologist, ROSANA SOUZA, Psychologist and others
John Jones v. Anthony King, et al
as 12-1842
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN JONES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: ANTHONY KING, AMY M. BONITO and TOM COMBS
Jones v. Finco et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv12420
Plaintiff: John Jones
Defendant: Tom Finco, W Sweigett, W Chapman and others
King v. The City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv02344
Defendant: "John Doe" and "Jane Doe" and The City of New York
Plaintiff: Anthony King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blumenthal v. Combs et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv11859
Plaintiff: Thomas Henry Blumenthal, III
Defendant: Thomas Combs, Sonia Amos-Warchock, Amy Bonito and others
Diehl v. King et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00402
Plaintiff: Gene Diehl
Defendant: Anthony King and Amy M. Bonito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. King et al
as 2:2012cv11297
Plaintiff: John Jones
Defendant: Anthony King, Amy M Bonito and Tom Combs
Pratt v. King et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv11233
Plaintiff: Christopher Pratt
Defendant: Anthony King, Michigan Parole Board, Amy Bonito and others
Ralph v. Sampson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv15097
Plaintiff: Aaron Ralph
Defendant: Barbara Sampson , Thomas Combs , Sonia Amos-Warchock and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00504
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?