Cases 121 - 130 of 142
James Winding v. Teaska Jackson, et al
as 12-60110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES C. WINDING
Defendant - Appellee:
TEASKA JACKSON, Individually and official capacity, GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED and E. L. SPARKMAN, Individually and official capacity
Jose Araiza v. GEO Group, Incorporated
as 12-10166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE GARCIA ARAIZA
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED
Kidwell v. GEO Group Incorporated et al
as 2:2012cv00292
Plaintiff:
Thomas Alec Kidwell
Defendant:
GEO Group Incorporated, John Gay, Billy Massingill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Winding v. GEO Group, Incorporated, et al
as 12-60082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES C. WINDING
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, MEDICAL DOCTOR AT EMCF, Individual and Official Capacity and E. L. SPARKMAN, Individual and Official Capacity
Loretta Bennett v. GEO Group, Incorporated
as 12-60017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORETTA BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, doing business as East Mississippi Correctional Facility
James Winding v. GEO Group, Incorporated
as 11-60658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES C. WINDING
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED
Hancock v. GEO Group Incorporated et al
as 2:2011cv01799
Plaintiff:
Alice Hancock
Defendant:
GEO Group Incorporated and Rick Mauldin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Dixon v. GEO Group, Incorporated, et al
as 11-60572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH DIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, J. ATWOOD, V. NEAL and others
Timothy Olmos v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 11-16882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY PAUL OLMOS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, GEO GROUP INCORPORATED, COMPASS GROUP INCORPORATED and others
James Winding v. Robert Grubbs, et al
as 11-60442
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES C. WINDING
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT GRUBBS, O. MILLER, WILLIE BOOKERT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
