Cases 121 - 130 of 176
McCall v. Leapord et al
as 2:2013cv01259
Plaintiff:
Terry Edward McCall
Defendant:
Christy Leapord, Officer Sewwell, Tammy Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00811
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hamilton v. USA
as 8:2013cv00790
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jesse J Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ferrell v. Smith et al
as 2:2013cv00498
Plaintiff:
Leroy Ferrell
Defendant:
John Hamilton Smith, Norman E Fogle and Thomas O MacGregor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00012
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hamilton v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 9:2012cv03111
Plaintiff:
Paul Hamilton, Jr and Louise Hamilton
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC , Argent Mortgage Company LLC , Litton Loan Servicing LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute
Young v. Griffin et al
as 1:2012cv03009
Plaintiff:
Rodney David Young
Defendant:
Christopher Griffin, Tammy Hamilton and Mary Hammond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv02805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv02414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
