Cases 121 - 130 of 336
TUCKER v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BEAVER COUNTY et al
as 2:2014cv00930
Petitioner:
EDWARD TUCKER, JR.
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BEAVER COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TUCKER-JACKSON et al v. UPLAND BOROUGH et al
as 2:2014cv04041
Plaintiff:
RELVIA TUCKER-JACKSON and NEIL TUCKER
Defendant:
UPLAND BOROUGH , JOHN EASTON , STEPHEN JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tucker v. Ebbert
as 1:2014cv01252
Petitioner:
Michael Tucker
Respondent:
David Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TUCKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv00788
Petitioner:
HARON TUCKER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYINGTON v. PERCHERON FIELD SERVICES, LLC
as 3:2014cv00090
Plaintiff:
ERIC BOYINGTON, MARY BETH GARNER, JOHN HUBBS and others
Defendant:
PERCHERON FIELD SERVICES, LLC and SALLY GRIFFITH CIMINI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
TUCKER v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv01769
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH N. TUCKER
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TUCKER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADLEPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
as 2:2014cv01481
Plaintiff:
BRANDON TUCKER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADLEPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BERSTECHER et al v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2014cv00182
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BERSTECHER , REBECCA HOWARD and ERNEST TUCKER
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY , JOSE DECOS and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
