Cases 121 - 130 of 85,010
Jermaine Carter v. Colm Connolly, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE L. CARTER
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE COLM F. CONNOLLY and COLLINS J. SEITZ
STEVENS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01395
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVENS, JOSE RICARDO BURGOS RESTO, HECTOR TOLENTINO and others
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELL PATH, DR. IBRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MERCER-SPENCER v. SPENCER et al
as 5:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
DEBRA M. MERCER-SPENCER
Defendant:
NATHANIL BRONDON SPENCER, SR., BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEMS and THE ARRESTING OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUCKER v. ANTHONY et al
as 5:2024cv01667
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TUCKER
Defendant:
JUDGE JAMES T. ANTHONY, ALFRED STIRBA, EARL C. SUPPLEE, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KWASNIK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01363
Petitioner:
MICHAEL W. KWASNIK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
KING v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI ALBION et al
as 2:2024cv01640
Petitioner:
KEIFF KING
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT SCI ALBION and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GEE v. COUNTY OF MERCER
as 3:2024cv05319
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GEE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
CHENG v. BYRD et al
as 1:2024cv05345
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG
Defendant:
K. BYRD, JAMES A. GIBBS, THOMAS J. GUBBIOTTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTE v. B.O.P. et al
as 2:2024cv01516
Petitioner:
JOSE MIGUEL MARTE
Respondent:
B.O.P., I.C.E. and SUPERIOR COURT, NJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
