Cases 131 - 140 of 614
MCNEVIN v. WIANT et al
as 1:2021cv00270
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW T. MCNEVIN
Defendant:
WIANT, DIETRICH, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CONNORS v. DOE 1 et al
as 2:2021cv01511
Plaintiff:
JOHN CONNORS
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE 1, OFFICER JOHN DOE 2, OFFICER JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCENTYRE v. SOUTHEASTERN VETERANS' CENTER et al
as 2:2021cv03622
Plaintiff:
GEORGIANNE MCENTYRE
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN VETERANS' CENTER, NHA ROHAN BLACKWOOD, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
COULTER v. COULTER et al
as 2:2021cv00861
Plaintiff:
JEAN COULTER
Defendant:
JAMES COULTER, GERRI PAULISICK, JOSEPH PAULISICK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. GEO SECURE SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02834
Plaintiff:
Jazmar Thomas
Defendant:
CORRECTION OFFICER, JOHN DOE 1, also known to Plaintiff as CORRECTION OFFICER, WAKU, GEO SECURE SERVICES, LLC, CORRECTION OFFICER, JOHN DOE 2, also known to Plaintiff as CORRECTION OFFICER, NIBLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cummings v. Schickvam et al
as 1:2021cv01006
Defendant:
D. Drum, Dr. Chuma, Powers and others
Plaintiff:
William Brandon Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARPENTER v. GEO SECURE SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02830
Defendant:
CORRECTION OFFICER, JOHN DOE 1, GEO SECURE SERVICES, LLC, CORRECTION OFFICER, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CARPENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JAMES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00786
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, LOIS ALLEN, MARK CAPPOZZA and others
Plaintiff:
PARIS L. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DELGADO v. RADDAD et al
as 2:2021cv02534
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, BLANCHE CARNEY, C/O RADDAD and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DELGADO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briggs v. SMU Counselor et al
as 3:2021cv00911
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe I and SMU Counselor
Plaintiff:
Theodore Briggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
