Cases 131 - 140 of 230
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States of America v. Lowe
as 14-1320
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kevin Lowe, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, David Moody, sealed defendant 2, Rashawn Whidbee, AKA sealed defendant 3, AKA Ra-Ra and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Elijah Pinckney, AKA Sealed Defendant 8
Neal Brown v. John Coleman
as 14-3320
Petitioner - Appellant:
NEAL D. BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN COLEMAN, Warden
ARWOOD et al v.CYPRESS HEALTH SYSTEMS FLORIDA INC et al
as 1:2014cv00043
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ARWOOD and BETTY ARWOOD
Defendant:
CYPRESS HEALTH SYSTEMS FLORIDA INC , TRI-COUNTY HOSPITAL WILLISTON LLC , RICHARD MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Teagarden v. Coleman et al
as 3:2014cv00647
Plaintiff:
Trevor Teagarden
Defendant:
John Coleman, Kevin Jones, Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arwood et al v. Cypress Health Systems, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00158
Plaintiff:
Thomas Arwood and Betty Arwood
Defendant:
Cypress Health Systems, Florida, Inc. , Tri-County Hospital, Williston, LLC , Richard Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Jose Torres, et al v. Simpatico, Inc., et al
as 14-1567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jose Torres, Guadalupe Clemente, Luz Walker and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Simpatico, Inc., Stratus Franchising, LLC, Peter Frese, Jr., individually and others
Coleman v. USA
as 5:2013cv07328
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
John Coleman, III v. USA
as 13-14525
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN COLEMAN, III
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stockton v. Mohr et al
as 3:2013cv02172
Plaintiff:
Wesley Stockton
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Theresa Daniel, John Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
