Cases 131 - 140 of 321
ALLEN v. DOE 1-4 et al
as 2:2020cv00100
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALLEN and DAVID HOLDER
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-4 and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Doe 1-4 et al
as 4:2020cv00010
Plaintiff:
David Allen and David Holder
Defendant:
John Doe 1-4 and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04830
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hollowell v. Meijer Stores Limited Partnership
as 2:2019cv00481
Defendant:
Meijer Stores Limited Partnership, John Does 1-10, Roe Corporations 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Hollowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNDERHILL v. KARDIS et al
as 1:2019cv04410
Defendant:
LAURA BODKIN, DUSHAN ZATECKY, EMILY KARDIS and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY UNDERHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TERRY v. CITY OF MUNCIE et al
as 1:2019cv03594
Plaintiff:
DANNY TERRY
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, CITY OF MUNCIE and MATTHEW HOLLANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Small v. Gelipeau et al
as 3:2019cv00751
Plaintiff:
Jason Douglas Small
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Gelipeau, John Doe 1 and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WANG et al v. CITY OF FISHERS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv04042
Defendant:
SETH JOHNSON, DAVID BOHMEIER, JOHN DOE 7 and others
Plaintiff:
CHUEN HUA WANG, GUARDIAN CHUEN HUA WANG and TIAN HUEI WANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARR v. CHRONIC CARE SOLUTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv04038
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-2, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, CHRONIC CARE SOLUTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WELDON CARROLL and ROBERT WELDON CARR, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormick v. Goebel et al
as 3:2019cv00608
Defendant:
Michelle Goebel, Elizabeth Black, Michelle Mussman and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney McCormick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
