Cases 131 - 140 of 985
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2021cv00575
Defendant:
Four Winds Behavioral Health and Four Winds Behavioral Health, Inc. and United States Attorney's Office for the District of New Mexico
Plaintiff:
Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
OPENED IN ERROR
as 2:2021cv00568
Defendant:
United States and Management & Training Corporation
Plaintiff:
Eusebio Daniel Sabillon Paz and UNKNOWN PERSON
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2021cv00525
Plaintiff:
Laura Burgess and Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Coleman v. Unknown Persons of the United States Marshal Service et al
as 2:2021cv00106
Defendant:
Unknown Persons of the United States Marshal Service, Unknown Persons of the Gary, Indiana Police Department and Unknown Persons of the Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearm Agency
Plaintiff:
Victoria Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2021cv00276
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Plaintiff:
Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Conair Corporation v. Barberium's
as 1:2021cv01663
Defendant:
Barberium's and Unknown Person(s) or Entity(ies) doing business as Barberium's
Plaintiff:
Conair Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Midland National Life Insurance Company v. Baker et al
as 1:2021cv10477
Defendant:
Robert A. Wilkinson, Unknown Personal Representative, Joanne Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Midland National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2021cv00245
Defendant:
Santa Fe Police Department, Nick Wood, Isodoro Vigil and others
Plaintiff:
Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Robert Garrett, Jr. v. Franklin Richardson
as 21-6239
Defendant:
B. ROBERTS, STEPHON, C. HINDENBURG, II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LOUIS GARRETT, JR., a/k/a Chubby, a/k/a Chubb, a/k/a Tru, a/k/a Kweli, a/k/a Justice
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANKLIN RICHARDSON, MCBRIDE and ROGERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
