Cases 141 - 150 of 485
McKenna v. HP Incorporated et al
as 3:2022cv08016
Plaintiff:
Annette-Lynn McKenna
Defendant:
HP Incorporated, Enquire Lores, Christoph Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Devin Andrich v. Michael Cimino, et al
as 22-15141
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEVIN ANDRICH
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL CIMINO, ALLISTER ADEL, Maricopa County Attorney and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Speers #168327 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00172
Petitioner:
Phillip Gregory Speers
Respondent:
David Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Kevlin Omar Brown
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich and Lawrence M Wharton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00170
Petitioner:
Michael Blas Rivera
Respondent:
David Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chavarria #304464 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00102
Petitioner:
Isaias Chavarria
Respondent:
David Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seneca #113423 v. Koeppel et al
as 2:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Kristofer Michael Seneca
Defendant:
Cynthia M Koeppel, Quinn Harvey, Alfred Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Ducey et al
as 2:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
Charles Ferguson
Defendant:
Doug Ducey, David Byers and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graven v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
William A Graven
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich, Michael Bailey, Don Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jorge Guerrero v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 22-15039
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORGE GUERRERO
Respondent / Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General and DAVID SHINN, Director
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
