Cases 141 - 150 of 36,585
Brown v. State of NC et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Respondent:
NC Department of Adult Public Safety, State of NC, NC Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Marshall Lee Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sweat v. Harvey
as 1:2024cv01943
Plaintiff:
Leary Sweat, Jr.
Defendant:
Director Mr. Crayman J. Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Chronister v. Wallace
as 1:2024cv01946
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lynn Chronister
Respondent:
Terri Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ezeah v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02083
Petitioner:
Ken Ejimofor Ezeah
Respondent:
Warden K. Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tvrdy v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02084
Petitioner:
Jarod Steven Tvrdy
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Black v. NCDAC
as 3:2024cv00391
Petitioner:
Martinez O. Black
Respondent:
NCDAC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Timothy R. Smith
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez-Turcio v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00193
Petitioner:
Javier Alex Martinez-Turcio
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Forbes v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00194
Petitioner:
Dennis A. Forbes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Reed v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00195
Petitioner:
Corey Stephon Reed
Respondent:
W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
