Cases 151 - 160 of 16,131
Piard v. Stanley
as 4:2024cv40004
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Kelly Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benbow v. Officer Carnavale et al
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Aaron Benbow and Aaron C. Benbow
Defendant:
Officer Carnavale, Lt. Amaral, Deputy Warden Aul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinney v. Police of La Salle Illinois, et al
as 24-1035
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN PINNEY, a/k/a Gitapushy Val Angel
Defendant:
LASALLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, LASALLE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, LASALLE COUNTY COURT and others
Banks v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Christopher Banks
Defendant:
Williams, Rhode Island Department of Corrections and Lonciaux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carleton v. Wintle, et al
as 24-1032
Plaintiff:
RYAN T. CARLETON
Defendant:
PISCATAQUIS COUNTY JAIL, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MAINE CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Laurence, Jr. v. Nerohna et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Norman Laurence, Jr.
Defendant:
Peter F Nerohna, Wayne T. Salisbury Jr., Rachel C. Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1006
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individial capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individial capacity and others
Angulo-Mero v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Humberto E. Angulo-Mero
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Foistner v. FMC Devens, Warden
as 1:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Joseph A. Foistner
Respondent:
FMC Devens, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Piard v. Hakala et al
as 4:2023cv40180
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Officer Hakala and Officer Bariamis
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
