Cases 151 - 160 of 1,263
United States of America v. Google Inc. et al
as 4:2018mc80071
Movant:
United States of America
Respondent:
Google Inc. and You Tube, LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. Applins (Thomas)
as 18-972
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Billy J. Applins, AKA Gee, AKA Billy Pringle, James Clayton Kelly, AKA Boom, Nathan Speights, The Mole and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Gregory Thomas, AKA Little Earl, E-Z
KIM v. WATCH TOWER BIBLE &TRACT SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2018cv00609
Plaintiff:
SEUNGJIN KIM
Defendant:
WATCH TOWER BIBLE &TRACT SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA, WATCH TOWER BIBLE &TRACT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK, INC., CHRISTIAN CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Green v. YouTube, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00203
Defendant:
Facebook, Go Fund Me, Google Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Isaac Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Biltz v. Google, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00059
Defendant:
Google Adwords, Google, Inc., Does 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Andrew Blitz and Mark Andrew Biltz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sayre v. Google, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
Paul Joseph Sayre
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Bradley James Much v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv09292
Defendant:
ABC Corporation, AT and T, Actors, Actresses and Media Personalities and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Much
Sayre v. Google, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00791
Plaintiff:
Paul Joseph Sayre
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Demetrick Pennie, et al v. Twitter, Inc., et al
as 17-17536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRICK PENNIE and RICK ZAMARRIPA
Defendant - Appellee:
TWITTER, INC., GOOGLE, INC. and FACEBOOK, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
